|
Home
Page
Search
Final
Report
- The Final Report text
- Summary - Recommendations
- Annexes
Interim
Report
Evidence
Inquiry
Seminars
About
the Inquiry
Help
|
|
Final Report > Recommendations > Care of an appropriate standard > Monitoring standards and performance
<< previous | next >>
Monitoring standards and performance
Local monitoring
- The process of clinical audit, which is now widely practised within trusts, should be at the core of a system of local monitoring of performance. Clinical audit should be multidisciplinary.
- Clinical audit must be fully supported by trusts. They should ensure that healthcare professionals have access to the necessary time, facilities, advice and expertise in order to conduct audit effectively. All trusts should have a central clinical audit office which co-ordinates audit activity, provides advice and support for the audit process, and brings together the results of audit for the trust as a whole.
- Clinical audit should be compulsory for all healthcare professionals providing clinical care and the requirement to participate in it should be included as part of the contract of employment.
National monitoring
- The monitoring of clinical performance at a national level should be brought together and co-ordinated in one body: an independent Office for Information on Healthcare Performance. This Office should be part of CHI.
- The Office for Information
on Healthcare Performance should supplant the current fragmentation
of approach through a programme of activities involving the co-ordination
of the various national audits. In addition to its other responsibilities,
the new system should provide a mechanism for surveillance whereby patterns
of performance in the NHS which may warrant further scrutiny can be
identified as early as possible.
Information systems
- The current `dual' system of collecting data in the NHS in separate administrative and multiple clinical systems is wasteful and anachronistic. A single approach to collecting data should be adopted, which clinicians can trust and use and from which information about both clinical and administrative performance can be derived.
- Steps should be taken nationally and locally to build the confidence of clinicians in the data recorded in the Patient Administration Systems in trusts (which is subsequently aggregated nationally to form the Hospital Episode Statistics). Such steps should include the establishment by trusts of closer working arrangements between clincians and clinical coding staff.
- The Hospital Episode Statistics database should be supported as a major national resource which can be used reliably, with care, to undertake the monitoring of a range of healthcare outcomes.
- Systems for clinical audit and for monitoring performance rely on accurate and complete data. Competent staff, trained in clinical coding, and supported in their work are required: the status, training and professional qualifications of clinical coding staff should be improved.
- The system of incentives and penalties to encourage trusts to provide complete and validated data of a high quality to the national database should be reviewed. Any new system must include reports of each trust's performance in terms of the quality and timeliness of the submission of data. The systems within a trust for producing data of a high quality, and its performance in returning such data in a timely manner to the national database, should be taken into account in the process of validating and revalidating the trust.
- At national level, the indicators of performance should be comprehensible to the public as well as to healthcare professionals. They should be fewer and of high quality, rather than numerous but of questionable or variable quality.
- The need to invest in world-class IT systems must be recognised so that the fundamental principles of data collection, validation and management can be observed: that data be collected only once; that the data be part and parcel of systems used to support healthcare professionals in their care of patients; and that trusts and teams of healthcare professionals receive feedback when data on their services are aggregated.
Publication of information about performance and standards
- Patients and the public must be able to obtain information as to the relative performance of the trust and the services and consultant units within the trust.
- As part of their Annual Reports trust boards should be required to report on the extent of their compliance with the national clinical standards. These reports should be made public and be made available to CHI.
<< previous | next
>> | back to top
|